El rol de líder transformacional en equipos diversos y sus efectos en variables emergentes, para entender el desempeño grupal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36791/tcg.v8i20.168Palabras clave:
Liderazgo transformacional, equipos de trabajo, desempeño organizacionalResumen
Actualmente, la diversidad de equipos tiende a ser el modelo de unidad de trabajo común en las organizaciones, debido a la transculturalidad, la globalización y la constante interacción de diversas generaciones de empleados en un mismo sistema. La gestión de un equipo diverso supone retos importantes en el entorno organizacional. El líder es la figura que gestiona recursos y estados emergentes de un equipo para lograr resultados como: desempeño grupal. Derivado de este fenómeno, se realizó una revisión de la literatura para identificar elementos que interactúan entre el liderazgo transformacional y el desempeño de equipos de trabajo en las organizaciones. Se trata de un documento preponderantemente descriptivo y exploratorio, apoyado en revisión documental. Se llega a la conclusión que las organizaciones deberían conocer que entre el rol que juega el liderazgo transformacional y el desempeño de equipos de trabajo, donde intervienen factores como la diversidad de características de los miembros, el engagement grupal, la cohesión del equipo y si existen conflictos entre sus miembros; es decir, que entre mayor conocimiento exista de estas características, se podrán aplicar estrategias para incrementar la efectividad del liderazgo transformacional y el desempeño grupal resultante.
Descargas
Citas
Argote, L. y McGrath, J. (1993). Group processes in organizations. En Cooper, C.L., Robertson, I.T. (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8. John Wiley y Sons, New York, 333–389.
Arnold, K. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: A review and directions for future DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000062
research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3). 381-393. https://doi. org/10.1037/ocp0000062
Bakker, A., y Xanthopoulou, D. (2009). The crossover of daily work engagement: Test of an actor–partner interdependence DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017525
model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1562–1571
Bakker, A., Van Emmerik, H., y Euwema, M. (2006). Crossover of burnout and engagement in work teams. Work and
Occupations, 33, 464-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888406291310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888406291310
Barsade, S. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644-675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912
Barsade, S., Ward, A., Turner, J., y Sonnenfeld, J. (2000). To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2667020
Black, J., Kim, K., Rhee, S., Wang, K., y Sakchutchawan, S. (2019). Self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Team Performance
Management: An International Journal, 25(1/2), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-01-2018-0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-01-2018-0005
Borman, W., y Motowidlo, S. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10,99-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press. Cartwright, D., y Zander, A. (1968). Group Dynamics:
Research and Theory, Harper and Row, New York, NY.
Chen, G., Kirkman, B., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., y Rosen, B. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and
performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331
Chiniara, M., y Bentein, K. (2018). The servant leadership advantage: When perceiving low differentiation in leader-member
relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2),
–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.002
Cox, T., y Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274465
Management Executive, 5(3), 45-56.
Cruz-Ortiz, V., Salanova, M., y Martínez, I. (2013). Liderazgo transformacional: investigación actual y retos futuros. Universidad y Empresa, 25, 13–32.
Cruz-Ortiz, V., Salanova, M., y Martínez, I. (2013). Liderazgo transformacional y desempeño grupal: Unidos por el
Engagement grupal. Revista de Psicología Social, 28(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347413806196762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1174/021347413806196762
De Dreu, C., y West, M. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191
Journal of Applied Psychology,86(6), 1191–1201.
Driskell, J., Hogan, R., y Salas, E. (1987). Personality and group performance. Group processes and intergroup relations.
Review of personality and social psychology, 9, 91-112.
Du, J., Ma, E., y Lin, X. (2021). When diversity leads to divided teams: A multi-level moderated mediation model of team faultlines and employee engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102818.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102818
Edwards, B., Day, E., Arthur, W., y Bell, S. (2006). Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.727
team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 727-36.
Erdogan, B., y Bauer, T. (2014). Leader-member Exchange (LMX) Theory: The Relational Approach to. The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations, 407–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.013.020
Evans, C., y Dion, K. (2012). Group Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Small Group Research, 43(6), 690–701.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412468074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412468074
García-Solarte, M. (2015). Formulación de un modelo de liderazgo desde las teorías organizacionales. Entramado, 11(1),
–79. https://doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2015v11n1.21111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2015v11n1.21111
García-Solarte, M. (2015). Papel de los seguidores en el desarrollo de las teorías de liderazgo organizacional. Apuntes Del DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/22565779.3542
CENES, 34(59), 155–184. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=479547211007
Goodman, S., y Svyantek, D. (1999). Person-environment fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter. Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1682
of Vocational Behavior, 55, 254–275.
Greer, L. (2014). Power in teams: Effects of team power structures on team conflict and team outcomes. En O. B. Ayoko, N. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781006948.00014
M. Ashkanasy, y K. A. Jehn (Eds.), Handbook of conflict management research, 93–108. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
Publishing.
Gruenfeld, D., Mannix, E., Williams, K., y Neale, M. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member
familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 67, 1-15.
Hackman, J. (1987). The design of work teams. En Lorsch, J. (ed.) Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall, 315-42.
Hambrick, D., Cho, T., y Chen, M. (1996) The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659-684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393871
Harrison, D., Price, K., y Bell, M. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256901
Harrison, D., Price, K., Gavin, J., y Florey, A. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/3069328
deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-45.
Hoch, J., y Dulebohn, J. (2013). Shared leadership in enterprise resource planning and human resource management system implementation. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.06.007
Hoegl, M., y Gemuenden, H. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449.
Hogg, M., y Hains, S. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 295-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.295
Horwitz, S., y Horwitz, I. (2007). The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587
Jackson, S., y Joshi, A. (2011). Work team diversity. En S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1, 651–686. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/12169-020
Jackson, S., May, K., y Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision making teams. En R. A.
Guzzo, E. Salas, y Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, 204–261. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey Bass.
Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t05164-000
Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
Jung, H., y Yoon, H. (2018). Improving frontline service employees’ innovative behavior using conflict management in the
hospitality industry: the mediating role of engagement. Tourism Management, 69, 498–507.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.035
Karau, S., y Williams, K. (1997). The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 1(2), 156-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.1.2.156
Kim, M. (2017). Effects of team diversity, transformational leadership, and perceived organizational support on team learning behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(8), 1255–1269.
https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6325
Kozlowski, S. (2018). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams: A Reflection. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 13(2), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617697078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617697078
Kozlowski, S., y Ilgen, D. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
Interest, 7, 77–124.
Lauring, J., y Selmer, J. (2013). Diversity attitudes and group knowledge processing in multicultural organizations. European DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.03.016
Management Journal, 31, 124–136. https://doi.org/bsv5
Mannix, E., y Neale, M. (2005). What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x
Marks, M., Mathieu, J., y Zaccaro, S. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of positiveteam processes. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259182
Academy of Management Review, 263, 356-76.
Martínez, A., L. M., Pérez, M., y Vela, M. (2004). La diversidad en los equipos de trabajo: estudio de sus efectos y factores moderadores. Icade. Revista De La Facultad De Derecho, (62), 133-154.
https://revistas.comillas.edu/index.php/revistaicade/article/view/7210
Martínez, I. M., Salanova, M., y Cruz-Ortiz, V. (2020). Our Boss is a Good Boss! Cross-level Effects of Transformational Leadership on Work Engagement in Service Jobs. Revista de Psicología Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 36(2), 87–94.
https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2020a10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2020a10
Mathieu, J., Kukenberger, M., D'Innocenzo, L., y Reilly, G. (2015). Modeling reciprocal team cohesion–performance
relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members' competence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 713 734. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0038898
Milliken, F., y Martins, L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258667
organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
Mohammed, S., y Angell, L. (2003). Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which differences make a difference for team DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496403257228
performance? Small Group Research, 34, 651- 77.
Molina-Sabando, L., Briones-Véliz, Í., y Arteaga-Coello, H. (2016). El comportamiento organizacional y suimportancia para la
administración de empresas. Dominio de Las Ciencias, 2(4), 498–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23857/pocaip DOI: https://doi.org/10.23857/POCAIP
Molina, N. P. (2005). Herramientas para investigar ¿Qué es el estado del arte? Revista Ciencia y Tecnología para la Salud Visual y Ocular, No. 5, 73-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19052/sv.1666
Northouse, P. (2001). Leadership Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Peiró, J., y Rodríguez, I. (2008). Estrés laboral, liderazgo y salud organizacional. Papeles del Psicólogo, 26(1), 68-82.
https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77829109
Pelled, L. (1996). Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.6.615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.6.615
Phillips, K., Mannix, E., Neale, M., y Gruenfeld, D. (2004). Diverse groups and information sharing: The effect of congruent DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.003
ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 497–510.
Pierce, J., y Newstrom, J. (2003). Leaders and the leadership process: Readings, self-assessment and applications. Boston,
MA: McGraw-Hill.
Rafferty, A., y Griffin, M. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.009
Ramírez, G. (2013). Liderazgo organizacional. Un desafío permanente. Universidad y Empresa, 15(25), 5–11.
http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=187229746001
Rojero-Jiménez, R., Gómez-Romero, J., y Quintero Robles, L. (2019). El liderazgo transformacional y su influencia en los
atributos de los seguidores en las Mipymes mexicanas. Estudios Gerenciales, 35(151).
https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2019.151.3192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2019.151.3192
Romero, D. (2010). La dimensión individual en el comportamiento organizacional. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología:
Ciencia y Tecnología, 3(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.3103
Romero, J. (2020). Los retos de la economía mexicana: comercio, inversión extranjera, industria nacional y
cambio tecnológico. Journal of Economic Literature,17(51), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.24488143e.2020.51.576
Salanova, M. (2009). Organizaciones Saludables: Una aproximación desde la Psicología Positiva. Psicología Positiva
Aplicada, 403–428. http://www.integraorg.com/wp/content/docs/organizaciones saludables.pdf
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González–Romá, V., y Bakker, A. (2001). The measurement of Engagement and burnout: A
two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
https://doi.org/10.1023/1015630930326
Schmutz, J., Meier, L., y Manser, T. (2019). How effective is teamwork really? The relationship between teamwork and
performance in healthcare teams: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 9(9).
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028280
Simons, T., y Peterson, R. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10. 1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
Sinha, T., y Kapur, M. (2021). When Problem Solving Followed by Instruction Works: Evidence for Productive Failure. Review of Educational Research, 91(5), 761–798. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019105
Smith, K., Smith, K., Sims, H., O’Bannon, D., Scully, J., y Olian, J. (1994). Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 412-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393297
Tajfel, H. (2010). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., y Turner, J. (1986). The social identity of intergroup behavior. En Worchel, S. y Austin, W. (Eds), Psychology of
intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 7-24.
Tarakci, M., Greer, L., y Groenen, P. (2016). When does power disparity help or hurt group performance? Journal of Applied
Psychology, 101(3), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000056
Tekleab, A., Quigley, N., y Tesluk, P. (2009). A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t60018-000
effectiveness. Group and Organization Management, 34(2), 170-205.
Torrente, P., Salanova, M., y Llorens, S. (2013). Spreading engagement: On the role of similarity in the positive contagion of
teamwork engagement. Revista de Psicología Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 29(3), 153–159.
https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2013a21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2013a21
Triana, M., Kim, K., Byun, S., Delgado, D., y Arthur, W. (2021). The Relationship Between Team Deep‐Level Diversity and Team Performance: A Meta‐Analysis of the Main Effect, Moderators, and Mediating Mechanisms. Journal of Management
Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12670
Van Knippenberg, D., y Mell, J. N. (2016). Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional
diversity to emergent diversity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 135–145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.007
Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C., y Homan, A. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-22.
Wageman, R., y Gordon, F. (2005). As the twig is bent: How group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0146
Organization Science, 16, 687-700.
Webber, S., y Donahue, L. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700202
A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141-62.
Williams, K., y O'Reilly, C. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research
Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.
Wise, S. (2013). Can a team have too much cohesion? The dark side to network density. European Management Journal, 32, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.005
-711.
Yoo, Y., y Alavi, M. (2001). Media and group cohesion: relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3250922
consensus. MISQuarterly, 25(3), 371-390.
Zhang, Y., y Hou, L. (2012). The romance of working together: Benefits of gender diversity on group performance in China. Human Relations, 65, 1487–1508. https://doi.org/bsv8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453931
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Jean Manuel Zamarripa Montes, Miguel Ángel Vega Campos, Aída Ortega Velázquez
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
La Revista Trascender, Contabilidad y Gestión se compromete a asegurar la confidencialidad y privacidad dela información personal que se capture en éste sistema de conformidad con los lienamientos editoriales de la Universidad de Sonora
La información será utilizada únicamente para fines editoriales, académicos y de investigación, notificándose de forma directa al usuario registrado en el sistema, con el alcance que el usuario establezca al momento de su registro.
